Showing posts with label onthe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label onthe. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Can I ghost an SQL server?

I have a test environment that we rebuild servers on a regular basis.
To streamline the process we use ghost. We will be installing SQL on
the servers and want to build a ghost image with that build. We have
tested it by doing the build, loading the data, and then stopping all
the services and setting them to manual. After we Ghost the machine,
we start up the services and reset them to Automatic. Seems to work.

My question is:

Are there any risks? Should I expect any adverse affects?

Thanks for all your help!(otisim@.YAHOO.COM) writes:
> I have a test environment that we rebuild servers on a regular basis.
> To streamline the process we use ghost. We will be installing SQL on
> the servers and want to build a ghost image with that build. We have
> tested it by doing the build, loading the data, and then stopping all
> the services and setting them to manual. After we Ghost the machine,
> we start up the services and reset them to Automatic. Seems to work.
> My question is:
> Are there any risks? Should I expect any adverse affects?

Well, there is one catch. I assume that you rename the machines once
the ghosting as been completed. In this case @.@.servername is likely
to retain the old name or be NULL. In the latter case, you need to do:

sp_addserver NEWNAME, local

Restart SQL Server after this. If @.@.servername retains the old name
I would try dropping it with sp_dropserver first, although I don't
know if it works.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin.../2000/books.asp|||Actually, we are keeping the same name. This is because it is just a
rebuild of the same server.

In other words, we do some testing, we reimage the machine (so we start
with a fresh standard image), and then do more testing.

So we want to keep the same name. We are not using sysprep or making
any other changes. Same hardware, same build, same everything. Just
want to clear out any changes that were made during testing.

Thanks so much for the response.

Steve

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Can a burrito corrupt a single user's records?

I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user on
the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker. The
lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the PC
which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen incidents
where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records? Is
there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
Pancho.The important question is, was this a plain burrito, or was there cheese
involved? Oh, and I should probably also ask, black beans or pintos?
While you're figuring out the answer to that one, run DBCC CHECKDB on your
database and see if you can repair the issues. There may be more corruption
you're not seeing simply because no one else has retrieved the rows -- yet.
Adam Machanic
SQL Server MVP
http://www.datamanipulation.net
--
"Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
> I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
> unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user
on
> the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
> someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker.
The
> lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the
PC
> which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen
incidents
> where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records?
Is
> there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
> Pancho.|||If the burrito is the culprit, I would like to suggest that it be called
Bandito Burrito... ;-)
"Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
>I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
> unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user
> on
> the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
> someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker.
> The
> lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the
> PC
> which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen
> incidents
> where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records?
> Is
> there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
> Pancho.|||MSDN has covered this topic in depth:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/...px?item=burrito
(ok, so I was having a little querystring fun... it's Friday, sue me.)
Pancho wrote:
>I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
>unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user on
>the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
>someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker. The
>lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the P
C
>which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen incidents
>where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records? Is
>there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
>Pancho.
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forum...server/200508/1|||Can u send that burrito ,me i want to test on my production database
with 200 users.
They all are hungry
thanx this helps u
from
killer|||You got the path wrong:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/...px?item=burrito
:D
Adam Machanic
SQL Server MVP
http://www.datamanipulation.net
--
"Frefaln via droptable.com" <forum@.droptable.com> wrote in message
news:52BE5071FF4C0@.droptable.com...
> MSDN has covered this topic in depth:
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/...burrito

>
> (ok, so I was having a little querystring fun... it's Friday, sue me.)
>
> Pancho wrote:
on[vbcol=seagreen]
day[vbcol=seagreen]
The[vbcol=seagreen]
PC[vbcol=seagreen]
incidents[vbcol=seagreen]
Is[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> --
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forum...server/200508/1|||I like it when somebody add a little bit of humor to our everyday problems.
Adding to what Adam said, check if the property "TORN_PAGE_DETECTION" is on
in this db.
AMB
"Adam Machanic" wrote:

> The important question is, was this a plain burrito, or was there cheese
> involved? Oh, and I should probably also ask, black beans or pintos?
> While you're figuring out the answer to that one, run DBCC CHECKDB on your
> database and see if you can repair the issues. There may be more corrupti
on
> you're not seeing simply because no one else has retrieved the rows -- yet
.
>
> --
> Adam Machanic
> SQL Server MVP
> http://www.datamanipulation.net
> --
>
> "Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
> on
> The
> PC
> incidents
> Is
>
>|||Perhaps a variant of Montezuma's Revenge?
"ChrisR" wrote:

> If the burrito is the culprit, I would like to suggest that it be called
> Bandito Burrito... ;-)
>
> "Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Me too. But it really did happen!
"Frefaln via droptable.com" wrote:

> MSDN has covered this topic in depth:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/...px?item=burrito
>
> (ok, so I was having a little querystring fun... it's Friday, sue me.)
>
> Pancho wrote:
>
> --
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forum...server/200508/1
>|||Adam:
1. Thanks for the DBCC suggestion.
2. Early reports are that it was beef, bean and cheese. It may have been
the Tina's brand which are cheap but good.
3. Our engineers are attempting a workaround by running the microwave in
"Thaw" mode first to soften the burrito, then zapping it at full power to
heat before eating, for a briefer time period.

"Adam Machanic" wrote:

> The important question is, was this a plain burrito, or was there cheese
> involved? Oh, and I should probably also ask, black beans or pintos?
> While you're figuring out the answer to that one, run DBCC CHECKDB on your
> database and see if you can repair the issues. There may be more corrupti
on
> you're not seeing simply because no one else has retrieved the rows -- yet
.
>
> --
> Adam Machanic
> SQL Server MVP
> http://www.datamanipulation.net
> --
>
> "Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
> on
> The
> PC
> incidents
> Is
>
>

Can a burrito corrupt a single user's records?

I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user on
the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker. The
lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the PC
which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen incidents
where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records? Is
there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
Pancho.
The important question is, was this a plain burrito, or was there cheese
involved? Oh, and I should probably also ask, black beans or pintos?
While you're figuring out the answer to that one, run DBCC CHECKDB on your
database and see if you can repair the issues. There may be more corruption
you're not seeing simply because no one else has retrieved the rows -- yet.
Adam Machanic
SQL Server MVP
http://www.datamanipulation.net
"Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
> I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
> unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user
on
> the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
> someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker.
The
> lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the
PC
> which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen
incidents
> where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records?
Is
> there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
> Pancho.
|||If the burrito is the culprit, I would like to suggest that it be called
Bandito Burrito... ;-)
"Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
>I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
> unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user
> on
> the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
> someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker.
> The
> lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the
> PC
> which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen
> incidents
> where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records?
> Is
> there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
> Pancho.
|||MSDN has covered this topic in depth:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/S...x?item=burrito
(ok, so I was having a little querystring fun... it's Friday, sue me.)
Pancho wrote:
>I have a user of SQL-based CRM application. She is the only one who is
>unable to see her associated contact records. She is also the only user on
>the same electrical circuit as the kitchen at one of our offices. One day
>someone was microwaving a frozen burrito and blew the circuit breaker. The
>lights in the kitchen went out, the fridge and microwave stopped, and the PC
>which had the application open, lost power. Has anyone else seen incidents
>where power loss corrupts not an entire DB but an individual's records? Is
>there a burrito brand that can prevent this from recurring (jk). Thanks,
>Pancho.
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...erver/200508/1
|||Can u send that burrito ,me i want to test on my production database
with 200 users.
They all are hungry
thanx this helps u
from
killer
|||You got the path wrong:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/S...x?item=burrito
:D
Adam Machanic
SQL Server MVP
http://www.datamanipulation.net
"Frefaln via droptable.com" <forum@.droptable.com> wrote in message
news:52BE5071FF4C0@.droptable.com...
> MSDN has covered this topic in depth:
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/S...x?item=burrito[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> (ok, so I was having a little querystring fun... it's Friday, sue me.)
>
> Pancho wrote:
on[vbcol=seagreen]
day[vbcol=seagreen]
The[vbcol=seagreen]
PC[vbcol=seagreen]
incidents[vbcol=seagreen]
Is
>
> --
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...erver/200508/1
|||I like it when somebody add a little bit of humor to our everyday problems.
Adding to what Adam said, check if the property "TORN_PAGE_DETECTION" is on
in this db.
AMB
"Adam Machanic" wrote:

> The important question is, was this a plain burrito, or was there cheese
> involved? Oh, and I should probably also ask, black beans or pintos?
> While you're figuring out the answer to that one, run DBCC CHECKDB on your
> database and see if you can repair the issues. There may be more corruption
> you're not seeing simply because no one else has retrieved the rows -- yet.
>
> --
> Adam Machanic
> SQL Server MVP
> http://www.datamanipulation.net
> --
>
> "Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
> on
> The
> PC
> incidents
> Is
>
>
|||Perhaps a variant of Montezuma's Revenge?
"ChrisR" wrote:

> If the burrito is the culprit, I would like to suggest that it be called
> Bandito Burrito... ;-)
>
> "Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||Me too. But it really did happen!
"Frefaln via droptable.com" wrote:

> MSDN has covered this topic in depth:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/products/S...x?item=burrito
>
> (ok, so I was having a little querystring fun... it's Friday, sue me.)
>
> Pancho wrote:
>
> --
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...erver/200508/1
>
|||Adam:
1. Thanks for the DBCC suggestion.
2. Early reports are that it was beef, bean and cheese. It may have been
the Tina's brand which are cheap but good.
3. Our engineers are attempting a workaround by running the microwave in
"Thaw" mode first to soften the burrito, then zapping it at full power to
heat before eating, for a briefer time period.

"Adam Machanic" wrote:

> The important question is, was this a plain burrito, or was there cheese
> involved? Oh, and I should probably also ask, black beans or pintos?
> While you're figuring out the answer to that one, run DBCC CHECKDB on your
> database and see if you can repair the issues. There may be more corruption
> you're not seeing simply because no one else has retrieved the rows -- yet.
>
> --
> Adam Machanic
> SQL Server MVP
> http://www.datamanipulation.net
> --
>
> "Pancho" <Pancho@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0E8A27CD-039E-4892-9F7D-1CF05F878269@.microsoft.com...
> on
> The
> PC
> incidents
> Is
>
>